Answer: Just about everyone, apparently.
Here's another inexplicable case of progressive, anti-war Democrats making an exception for the hawkish centrist Hillary Clinton. In today's Counterpunch, discussing the Lamont victory, Norman Solomon asks, "will MoveOn now poll its membership in New York about whether to make an endorsement in the Clinton vs. Tasini race?"
Eli Pariser's answer sounds rather familiar. "Threshold" is the new buzzword in New York politics. Robert Hardt at NY1 seems to have started a trend.
August 14, 2006
How MoveOn Finesses the War on Her Behalf
Who's Afraid of Hillary Clinton?
By NORMAN SOLOMON
The leading pro-war Democrat in the Senate is hoping for a landslide in the New York primary next month. And unless progressives quickly mobilize to dent her vote total, she's likely to get it.
Hillary Clinton, of course, intends to be the Democratic presidential nominee in 2008. But first there's her quest to win big for reelection. If antiwar voters cut into Clinton's percentage in the primary on Sept. 12, despite overwhelming media visibility and a massive campaign war chest, her momentum would take a hit.
After Sen. Joe Lieberman lost to antiwar challenger Ned Lamont in Connecticut's Democratic primary last week, I thought some more about the fast-approaching Senate race in New York, where anti-war candidate Jonathan Tasini will be on the ballot next to Clinton.
Tasini, a former president of the National Writers Union, is more strongly and consistently antiwar than Lamont. And Tasini is an all-around progressive on issues from trade to economic justice to health care to the Middle East. But his campaign is underfunded. In contrast, the very wealthy Lamont self-financed his campaign with a few million dollars.