Ben Craw at Talking Points Memo wonders what Clinton's pledge of support for Lamont really means.

From TPM Cafe Midterm Roundup

[excerpt]
Clinton is, after all, much closer to Joe Lieberman on her stance on Iraq than she is to Ned Lamont. Many people wonder why the Senate primary race in New York, in which Clinton faces a challenge from Lamont-esque anti-war union organizer Jonathan Tasini (D), isn’t evolving more like the Connecticut race did. The big difference simply seems to be that Clinton is more popular (in her state at least) and a more skilled politician than Lieberman, more “in touch” with her constituents, despite her persistent unwillingness to disown her vote in support of the Iraq invasion. Arianna Huffington takes a closer look at Clinton’s Connecticut machinations. The coming weeks should tell us a lot about whether Hilary is serious about her support for Lamont, or if he is just another cog in some textbook Clinton triangulation.