Our state is one of the best arguments for Medicare For All. We have about 3 million people without health insurance--many of them children. The New York Times has a front-page story on the massive increase in health care costs that New York will face in the near future because of health care coverage for government workers. New York City government will see its health care costs quintuple to at least $5 billion and perhaps $10 billion, according to the story.
It's clear to me where this is going: firefighters, teachers and other public workers will be told that their health care benefits are too generous. If those workers strike to preserve health care, the mayor or the governor will call those people greedy or, perhaps, "thuggish" (the billionaire mayor's favorite phrase). The strikers will be pitted against the rest of the public, most of which will not enjoy the kind of health care coverage public employees have.
Rather than have such an ugly face-off between two groups of our citizens--all of whom deserve economic security and good health--we should immediately extend Medicare to every person in our state, and across the country.
Where does Hillary Clinton stand on this issue? I would hope that she would join our campaign's call for Medicare For All. It's not enough to simply poke around the edges, as my opponent has done by embracing Newt Gingrich in a call for utilizing technology to improve efficiency in health care administration.
No, we must take on the powerful health care industry which is preventing families from having the health and economic security they deserve. I understand that this is difficult for my opponent because two of the largest health care companies are among her biggest campaign contributors. But, I would hope she would join us in our call and choose individuals and their families over large corporate interests.